txetxes

Sexuality of the text >
Textuality of sex.
How about that being poetic?
No one can from now on make this claim:
that literary criticism can't be:
/literary
/sensual
/entertaining in itself.

It is an autonomous world!
We all live in our own world!
And do we dance on common ground?
Do you need to understand the words?
Or do they just need to speak to you (some, sometimes)?


Derived from: Hélène Cixous: about the idea that woman is not an origin but a 'writing effect' (écriture feminine). Claim: not sexuality of the text, but textuality of sex (sex is a product of writing). What all this means? I do not know as of yet. So sorry, no explanations here.